An Act

posted in: CASS Updates, Policy, WMATA | 3

Today, CM Bowser introduced legislation making it easier for Transit Police to arrest individuals who were engaging in lewd, indecent, obscene behavior on the Metro. One of the issues we’ve heard from Transit Police is they can’t arrest someone for masturbating, unless they see that person engaging in that behavior. Although we do NOT support more people getting arrested, we do want Metro to be safe for all, and not have to watch individuals doing obscene things while staring at you.

Here is the act:

______________________
Councilmember Muriel Bowser

A BILL

________

IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

________________________

To amend section 23-581 of the District of Columbia Official Code to enhance enforcement of the indecent exposure law by allowing police officers to arrest suspects without a warrant when officers have probable cause to believe that suspects have committed lewd, indecent, or obscene acts.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this
act may be cited as the “Sexual Harassment Prevention Act of 2012”.

Sec. 2. Section 23-581 of the District of Columbia Official Code is amended as follows:
(a) Subsection (a-7) (D.C. Official Code § 23-581(a-7)) is amended to read as follows:
“(a-7) A law enforcement officer may arrest a person without a warrant if the officer has probable cause to believe that the person has committed the offense of misdemeanor sexual abuse, misdemeanor sexual abuse of a child or minor, or lewd, indecent, or obscene acts as provided in sections 22-3006, 22-3010.01, and 22-1312.”
Sec. 3. Fiscal impact statement.
The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement of the Budget Director as the fiscal impact statement required by section 602(c)(3) b of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(3)).
Sec. 4. Effective date.
This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), and a 30-day period of congressional review as provided in Section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code §1-206(c)(1)), and publication in the District of Columbia Register.

What are your thoughts?

3 Responses

  1. gibert
    | Reply

    Those fat girls holding those signs know that no one is sexually harrassing them. Only in their dreams.

    • admin
      admin
      | Reply

      What type of comment is that?! And, completely inappropriate. Thanks “gilbert” for your contribution to this important discussion of sexual harassment and assault.

  2. Golden Silence
    | Reply

    I can’t tell you how to run your site, but these trolls need to no longer be allowed a forum to express their vile and ignorant thoughts.

Leave a Reply